Explain Agreement Opposed to Public Policy

When entering into a contract or agreement, both parties must adhere to certain legal guidelines, one of which is the doctrine of “agreement opposed to public policy.” This term refers to any agreement that violates public policy, meaning it is fundamentally wrong or against the welfare of society. In this article, we will explore the doctrine of agreement opposed to public policy and its implications.

The Doctrine of Agreement Opposed to Public Policy

The doctrine of agreement opposed to public policy is a common law principle that prohibits parties from entering into contracts or agreements that are contrary to public policy. It is based on the idea that certain agreements are inherently harmful to society, and therefore, should not be enforced. Such agreements are often deemed illegal, even if all parties have willingly entered into them.

Legal agreements that may be opposed to public policy include contracts that involve illegal activities, such as drug trafficking or prostitution, agreements that promote discrimination, or contracts that waive a party`s right to seek legal recourse for wrongful acts. Essentially, any agreement that violates social norms and beliefs is considered opposed to public policy.

Implications of Agreement Opposed to Public Policy

If a court determines that an agreement is opposed to public policy, it will be deemed unenforceable, even if both parties have agreed to its terms. This means that neither party will be bound by its provisions. Moreover, a court may also impose legal penalties on parties that attempt to enforce an agreement that is opposed to public policy.

The implications of an agreement being unenforceable can be significant, particularly for businesses. It can lead to financial losses, damage to reputation, and legal consequences. Therefore, it is essential to ensure that any agreement is not only legally valid but also conforms to public policy.

Examples of Agreement Opposed to Public Policy

There are several types of agreements that are commonly found to be opposed to public policy. These include:

1. Non-compete agreements that limit an employee`s ability to work for other employers in the same industry. Such agreements may be considered harmful as they limit an individual`s ability to earn a livelihood.

2. Contracts that waive a party`s right to sue for damages caused by another party`s negligence. Such agreements may be deemed harmful as they limit an individual`s right to seek legal recourse.

3. Agreements that involve illegal activities such as drug trafficking, prostitution or gambling. Such agreements are considered illegal as they violate criminal laws and promote activities that are harmful to society.

Final Thoughts

The doctrine of agreement opposed to public policy is an essential principle that governs the legality of agreements. Any agreement that violates public policy is deemed unenforceable, and parties that attempt to enforce it may face legal penalties. Therefore, it is crucial to ensure that any agreement you enter into conforms to public policy, is legally valid, and is in the best interest of society.

Uncategorized

admin